Key points
- Advanced marginality is not a leftover from the past: it is a structural feature of the capitalist city.
- Equating the American ghetto with the French banlieue erases very different histories and causes.
- Neoliberal policy answered poverty with more policing and less public service.
Loïc Wacquant, in his work Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality, addresses the issue of urban marginalization in postindustrial cities, focusing on the dynamics of extreme poverty and spatial segregation. Wacquant analyzes how these dynamics have evolved in the United States and Europe, comparing the ghettos of major American cities with the French banlieues. According to him, these urban areas are not only spaces of poverty, but territories defined by advanced marginality that combine economic, social, and political factors, reflecting the neoliberal state that has generated new forms of exclusion. One of the main concepts introduced by Wacquant is “advanced marginality,” which emerges as a consequence of deindustrialization and the collapse of traditional urban economies.
Through his research, Wacquant argues that this type of marginalization is not a residual phenomenon but a structural characteristic of advanced capitalist cities. The fragmentation of the working class and the disappearance of industrial jobs have left many urban neighborhoods without the capacity to integrate into the formal economy, generating ghettos where poverty, unemployment, and violence are concentrated. In his comparison between cities in the United States and Europe, Wacquant makes a key distinction between the “communal ghetto” in the United States and the “hyper-ghetto” in Europe. While the former is characterized by racial and ethnic exclusion, the latter reflects a more heterogeneous form of marginalization in terms of social class.
American ghetto and French banlieue
In the French banlieues, for example, segregation is the result of the dissolution of working-class territories under the pressure of mass unemployment and labor precarization, producing a combination of ethnic and economic marginalization. Another fundamental aspect of Wacquant’s work is his critique of the simplistic view that equates American ghettos with European banlieues. For him, this comparison ignores the historical and social particularities of each context. In the United States, marginalization is deeply rooted in the history of racial segregation, whereas in Europe the dominant factor is economic exclusion affecting diverse social groups.
Wacquant emphasizes the importance of understanding these differences in order to formulate more effective public policies. Furthermore, Wacquant analyzes how the state has played a crucial role in consolidating these spaces of advanced marginality. In both the United States and Europe, neoliberal policies have promoted disinvestment in public services and increased police repression instead of addressing the structural causes of poverty. These policies have contributed to the creation of “revanchist cities,” where state intervention focuses on the containment and control of marginalized populations rather than their integration.
In conclusion, Urban Outcasts offers a critical perspective on urban marginalization in postindustrial cities, highlighting how neoliberalism has generated new forms of exclusion and poverty. Through his comparative analysis, Wacquant provides a strong theoretical framework for understanding the complexity of advanced marginality and the power dynamics that shape ghettos and banlieues in the contemporary world.
Frequently asked questions
What is advanced marginality according to Wacquant?
A form of exclusion arising from deindustrialisation and the collapse of traditional urban economies, which leaves entire neighbourhoods unable to integrate into the formal economy and concentrates poverty, unemployment and violence in them.
How do the American ghetto and the French banlieue differ?
In the United States marginalisation is rooted in the history of racial segregation; in Europe the dominant factor is economic exclusion, which affects far more diverse social groups.











